Section 17 Housing Act CPOs

Specialist legal support for homeowners and landowners affected by s17 Housing Act CPOs, providing clear guidance, protection of rights and practical solutions during compulsory.

A local authority has the power, under s17 of the Housing Act 1985, to acquire empty or abandoned dwellings so that they can be put into productive use. The same Act also enables a Council to buy and repair (or demolish) dilapidated properties to make dangerous properties safe and/or enable a positive contribution to local housing stock.

In each case a compulsory purchase order (CPO) is made which enables the authority to acquire the properly compulsorily, with the legal rights of the owners/occupiers converting into a package of financial compensation under the rule of “equivalence” (i.e. the recipient should be in no better or no worse a position than had the CPO not been made and acted upon).

The specialist team here at Holmes & Hills can help you to understand the effect of a potential s17 Housing Act CPO will or may have on clients and their property; providing proactive advice to protect our clients’ interests and legal rights.

Why choose us

Our mission is to provide: Best Advice - Best Service - Best Outcomes

The specialist team here at Holmes & Hills can help you to understand the effect the regeneration project will or may have on clients and their property; providing proactive advice to protect our clients’ interests and legal rights.

We offer fixed-fee packages and will seek to recover our legal costs from the scheme promoter whenever possible. Learn more about our team and how we can support you.

How we can help

We have advised affected home and landowners on numerous s17 Housing Act CPO matters. The outcomes achieved for our clients include:

CPO threat removed

The threat of a CPO being removed and a s215 Notice (untidy site notice) being served and complied with – our client retained ownership and control of the property.

CPO withdrawn after re-occupation

The threat of a CPO being withdrawn following re-occupation/re-letting following a marital break-up - the property was put back into beneficial use.

CPO withdrawn after agreed sale

The threat of a CPO being withdrawn following agreement for sale following a marital break-up and lengthy divorce proceedings – (working alongside colleagues) a settlement as to the sale proceeds of the property was secured, without CPO intervention.

Private sale agreed despite CPO threat

Agreement for sale by private negotiation following threats of a CPO regarding a “hoarder next door” case – our client retained control of the sale of the property.

Full statutory compensation recovered

Full recovery of statutory compensation post-CPO in a case where the owner had become incapacitated and unable to maintain the investment property following a road traffic accident (and consequential health issues) – “equivalence” was achieved and our client able to “move on” with their life and without the tie/burden the property/issue had become.

Full replacement property costs recovered

Full recovery of compensation in other post-CPO cases, to include recovery of the cost of acquisition of a replacement property (i.e. stamp duty land tax, conveyancing costs, removals costs etc) – achieving “equivalence”.

Wherever possible, we seek to recover your reasonable costs from the acquiring authority. If you are affected by a section 17 Housing Act CPO and don't know what to do, our specialist CPO team can help you.

Get Expert Legal Advice

Call 01206 593933 for specialist Compulsory Purchase advice.
Or send an email

Key Contact

Michael Harman

Partner

mjh@holmes-hills.co.uk

View Profile

Related Pages

No items found

Your Section 17 Housing Act CPOs Team

No team found

Section 17 Housing Act CPOs Case Studies

Latest News
Useful Information
From departments and lawyers across Holmes & Hills.
Read More

A Guide for Shared Ownership Leaseholders

Callie Tuplin, Senior Solicitor at Holmes & Hills, explores the complexities of shared ownership lease extensions, from the 80‑year threshold […]
Read More

The Law of Unintended Consequences: Mixed‑Use Property and the Renters’ Rights Act 2026

Mark Rowlands, Senior Solicitor at Holmes & Hills, discusses Mixed‑Use Property and what the Renters’ Rights Act 2026 means for […]
Read More

Delay under the JCT Design and Build Contract 2024

Delay is a persistent source of disputes in the construction industry. Sophie Bennett, Associate at Holmes & Hills Solicitors, examines […]
Read More

Receive the latest legal updates

Get important legal updates, news and opinion sent to you straight from our solicitors.
Sign Up

A Mackman Group collaboration - market research by Mackman Research | website design by Mackman

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram