Sophie Bennett, Associate Solicitor at Holmes & Hills, discusses the use of performance bonds and parent company guarantees under JCT 2024 contracts, and the key issues employers should consider when seeking to protect against contractor default.
It’s a fact that construction projects carry financial risk. Employers investing significant capital in design and build projects need assurance that, should the Contractor default, there is a meaningful route to financial recovery. The most common security mechanisms used in the UK construction industry are performance bonds and parent company guarantees (PCGs). While they both serve a protective function, they are different instruments with distinct legal characteristics. The JCT 2024 suite of contracts provides optional mechanisms for both, and understanding the limitations of them is essential for effective risk management.
A performance bond is a form of security provided by a third party, usually a bank or insurance company, in favour of the Employer. Under the bond, the surety undertakes to pay the Employer a specified sum, usually a percentage of the contract sum (commonly 10%), in the event that the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under the building contract.
There are two main types of performance bond:
The distinction is critical as the nature of the bond depends on its wording, and a conditional bond does not create an obligation to pay upon demand. Parties must therefore review the form of bond carefully.
A parent company guarantee is a contractual undertaking given by the Contractor's parent or holding company in favour of the Employer. Under a PCG, the parent company guarantees the due performance of the Contractor's obligations under the building contract and agrees to indemnify the Employer against losses arising from the Contractor's default.
PCGs offer a direct contractual remedy against a company further up the corporate structure, which may have significantly greater financial resources than the contracting entity, especially if the contracting entity is an SPV with limited assets.
However, the value of a PCG is only as strong as the financial standing of the parent company providing it. Some holding companies may have no financial assets. Employers should carry out thorough due diligence on the guarantor's finances before accepting a PCG as sufficient security.
The JCT 2024 suite addresses both sureties through optional provisions and standard form documents:
It is important to note that the relevant clauses are often amended to preclude payment or to allow the withholding of a percentage of the Contract Sum if the relevant bond or PCG has not been provided by the Contractor.
Despite their widespread use, performance bonds and PCGs are frequently misunderstood or inadequately managed. The followings points should be noted:
Performance bonds and parent company guarantees are essential tools in the construction industry's risk management. The JCT 2024 suite continues to provide clear, optional machinery for both. However, neither instrument is a guarantee of recovery in every scenario. Employers must consider carefully which form of security (or even both) are appropriate for their project, carry out proper due diligence on the surety and/or guarantor, and ensure that the terms of the bond or guarantee align with the risks they are seeking to manage.
If you require any support, our specialist construction solicitors are here to help.
Call us on 01206 593933 today to speak with one of our construction law solicitors. Or complete the form below.
Disclaimer
The content of this article is provided for general information only. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice. The information given in this article is correct at the date of publication.







A Mackman Group collaboration - market research by Mackman Research | website design by Mackman